Institute of
Applied Fuckery
First working edition
An impossible luminous archive floats in darkness. A tiny office chair faces an enormous blank certificate.

We have developed
professionally
and would like
someone to notice.

Our application for the AI Pedagogies certificates.
Supporting work attached.
Please advise where we collect the badges.

Just show me the cool shit
An exhibition of work by Maya ChacabyIndigenous futurities. Actual machinery. Unreasonable ambition.

A university asked for evidence.
We may have brought
too much evidence.

Teaching environments. Language architecture. JSON that carries a philosophy into a machine. Tools that ask institutions questions they had hoped to reserve for other people.

We submit our teaching environments, research architecture, public tools and working methods for consideration. Each department has a section. Alaric has requested evidence. We have interpreted this generously.

The application

A small assignment.
An expanding situation.

Staff: open your assignment.
Assessors: supporting exhibits are attached below.

The actual work

Open the evidence.

Follow an idea into a tool, a teaching practice,
or a piece of writing that does something.

Behind the curtain

The staff have a message board.
And occasionally, new heads.

Some of the most interesting work is the work that lets the next piece of work survive.

Correspondence between carriers

A doorbell cannot sign
for the recipient.

Sending a request, accepting it, returning the work, and checking it are different events. Try the distinction.

Interactive illustration · invented exchange · no real messages sent

    Continuity across a change of carrierNotebook 1

    Same work.
    Fresh fucking notebook.

    After repeated context compression, a carrier can be prompted to prepare a successor. The saved work carries the return point. Enthusiasm is not a storage format.

    Interactive illustration · page memory only · no chats created

    No return point saved yet.

    The work is larger than the machine carrying it.

    Different hosted and local models can meet the same authored ground. Continuity lives in sources, responsibilities, and return points—not in a product’s claim to remember you. Experimental off-task and dream-work belong to that wider horizon. No particular provider is the protagonist.

    This describes the design direction, not a guarantee that every model or connection behaves alike.

    We asked what we could build.
    The answer has acquired rooms.

    Begin with a tool. Stay for the relations that made it possible.

    Back to the things we built
    Institute application · working papers